• I’ve not made demands on party, says Tinubu
• Probe looms as disquiet greets military overhaul
• Saraki clarifies tweets on NSA, Service Chiefs
PRESIDENT Muhammadu Buhari yesterday, appealed to members of the All
 Progressives Congress (APC) to forget their differences and their 
personal ambitions in order for the party to achieve its campaign 
manifestos of addressing security, economy, employment and corruption.
“If we don’t kill corruption, corruption will kill Nigeria,” he stated.
This is just as the leader of the APC, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, 
dismissed criticisms from the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) 
and others that the Buhari administration was too slow.
He said the government could not clean the 16-year- mess of the PDP in 30 days.
Tinubu also debunked speculations that he was at odds with the 
President because of his alleged demands for political patronage by the 
party.
Meanwhile, with Monday’s sacking of the National Security Adviser 
(NSA) and Service Chiefs appointed by his predecessor, Dr. Goodluck 
Jonathan, and their replacement with new hands , Buhari may have taken 
the first steps towards commencing a probe of the Nigerian military 
which he had promised during his campaign.
As a result, there is an unusual disquiet within security circles as 
guesses go on as to what nature and toll the probe would take.
Buhari who hosted the party leadership to Ramadan fast at the new 
Banquet Hall at the Presidential Villa, went down memory lane of how the
 party surmounted many obstacles to emerge strong enough to dislodge the
 PDP, urging members to lay aside their differences and unite for the 
sake of the country.
Buhari who commended Tinubu, the first chairman of the party, Chief 
Bisi Akande and the former chairman of the defunct All Nigerian People’s
 Party (ANPP), Chief Ogbonnaya Onu, for their sterling leadership roles 
in the consummation of the alliances that led to the birth of the APC, 
said it was important to reflect on their journey in order for them to 
appreciate how lucky they are as a political group.
Speaking to State House correspondents after the dinner, Tinubu 
denied media speculations that he had fallen out of favour with the 
President because of the later’s alleged refusal to patronize him 
politically, saying he was a loyal party member who believed in the 
philosophies and the ideals of the President.
According to him, “I have no demands of the party. If you understand 
what party politics and leadership is all about, it is about loyalty and
 commitment to the values which the leadership believes in. I believe in
 what the President believes in, I respect him and I stand firmly loyal 
to his cause.
“So you can go to any length of speculation . I have not responded to
 all of that because I understand the President and the President 
understands me clearly too.”
Explaining his apparent silence on the festering crisis trailing the 
June 9 election of the leadership of the National Assembly, Tinubu said:
 “That is an area where I am very cautious of my position and my 
utterances. I still want to keep my side of the interpretation or 
analysis to be able to achieve a resolution of the matter as quickly as 
possible.
“I am backing what the President has carefully enumerated and 
articulated to the party. The party is supreme. The party must have 
disciplined leadership and followers. The party’s process must be 
respected because that is the confidence and the trust of the people.”
“However in every environment, we should conflict, that is politics 
and conflict resolution mechanism would be applied to resolve all the 
problems so we are there. There is honour in every struggle and every 
competition, there must be honour in victory too.”
He said the APC was conscious of the expectations of Nigerians saying
 that it would not repeat the mistakes of the PDP. His words, “We are 
different, we cannot be PDP, we are APC, we will not repeat their 
mistakes. We know their mistakes, errors, we understand what Nigeria 
wanted and Nigerians gave this party victory because of our manifesto.
“We are pro people, we are progressives. We have had a conservative 
government in the last 16 years, this is a progressive party, just 
coming in barely 30 days. We understand the hope of Nigerians, we 
understand the expectations of Nigerians, we believe in that expectation
 and in our promise of prosperity to the people. We will not change 
that.”
While spokespersons for Defence, Army, Navy and Air Force have not 
issued a statement regarding the itinerary for handing or taking over, 
it is the President’s appointment of Major-Gen. Tukur Buratai from 
Course 29 set as the Chief of Army Staff that would set in motion the 
retirement of many senior officers.
Meanwhile, following criticisms of his Monday evening twitter message
 that: “Appointment of Service Chiefs is the exclusive function of the 
President. Senate can only confirm ministerial appointments”, Senate 
President Abubakar Olusola Saraki issued another statement to explain 
his earlier position.
A Federal High Court, sitting in Abuja, had on July 1, 2013 ruled 
that any appointment of Service Chiefs by the President without approval
 of the National Assembly is unconstitutional and illegal.
Justice Adamu Bello declared the appointments of the Service Chiefs 
without the National Assembly’s approval as null and void because they 
did not conform with Section 18 (1) and (2) of the Armed Forces Act, 
Cap. A20, Laws of the Federation.
A military source told The Guardian that the appointments actualise 
the pledge by Buhari when he was campaigning for votes to probe and 
restructure the military on assumption of office.
On February 1, 2015, Buhari, then a presidential candidate of the APC
 stated during his campaign in Bauchi, that he would probe the Nigerian 
military, accusing the high command of incompetence and sluggish 
execution of the war against Boko Haram.
He also accused them of corruption, vowing that they will account for
 the huge budgetary allocation to Defence and the way they procured 
military equipment to prosecute the war.
The statement released then by his campaign organisation read: “What 
he (Buhari) said at every given opportunity is that he is keenly 
interested in knowing what has gone wrong, if any, with the army that he
 knew. When he has access to them as Commander-in-Chief, he will like to
 hear from his commanders what the problems they are dealing with are so
 that they can be solved.
“In a democracy such as ours, all institutions of government, 
including the armed forces, are accountable. No country can achieve 
results in its counter-terrorism efforts when there is no transparency 
in the management of huge resources for the purpose. He will 
reinvigorate the Armed Forces and restore their rapidly- evaporating 
morale,” the statement had concluded.
The appointment of Buratai marks the first time since the return of 
democracy that such a large number of Courses will have to go to enable 
the President pick his choice, Chief of Army Staff.
For example, Lt.-Gen Victor Malu, who served from May 1999 to April 
2001, was of Course 3 while Gen. Alexander Ogomudia, who succeeded him 
from April 2001 to June 2003, was Course 7. Similarly, Gen. Martin 
Luther Agwai (2003 to 2006) was Course 9 while the late Gen. Andrew 
Owoye Azazi (June 2006 – May 2007) was Course 12. Late Lt.-Gen Luka 
Yusuf (June 2007 to August 2008) was Course 14. Lt.-Gen Abdulrahman 
Dambazzau (2008 to 2010) was of the 17 Regular Course. Gen. Azubuike 
Ihejirika (2010 to 2014) was Course 18 while Gen. Minimah, who was 
appointed on January 2015 is Course 25.
The planned probe of the military is also in line with the advice of 
former President Olusegun Obasanjo who in a letter dated March 31, 2015,
 told Buhari: “With so much harm already done to many national 
institutions including the military, which proudly nurtured you and me, 
you will have a lot to do on institution reform.”
Similarly, a critic of the Jonathan administration and Second Republic 
Federal lawmaker, Dr. Junaid Mohammed also advised that “given what we 
have seen in the military lately, Buhari must move immediately to clear 
the armed forces of politicians and ensure that only dedicated officers 
and men, who are willing to work for the country, are allowed in the 
system.”
Another military source said for the fight against insurgents to be 
intensified, the need to change the leadership of the military is 
imperative because “the chiefs knew they were going to be relieved of 
their appointments, so that focused commitment was no more there, even 
though they were allowed to carry on for 43 days into the new 
administration.”
The case, instituted by Lagos lawyer, Festus Keyamo, had challenged 
the practice of appointing military chiefs by the President without 
seeking the approval of the National Assembly.
Keyamo had argued in court that the appointments of Service Chiefs, 
which are political appointments, could not be different from other 
political appointments that require the confirmation of the National 
Assembly such as the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justices of the Supreme 
Court and Court of Appeal, Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes
 Commission, ministers, and so on.
Based on that judgment, which has not been appealed till date, 
Jonathan sought and got the approval of the National Assembly in January
 2014 when he appointed Alex Badeh as the Chief of Defence Staff, 
Kenneth Minimah as the Chief of Army Staff, Usman Jibrin as the Chief of
 Naval Staff and Adesola Nunayon Amosu as the Chief of Air Staff.
In a statement issued by the Media Office of the Senate President in 
Abuja yesterday, it was made clear that Saraki’s twitter message was not
 intended to mean that Senate had no role in the appointment of Service
 Chiefs.
The statement also said: ‘‘For the avoidance of doubt, Saraki has 
said his comment is without prejudice to extant laws and court 
pronouncements on the issue and therefore that the Senate will do the 
needful when the list of the new Service Chiefs is sent to it by Mr. 
President.’’
The Senate President himself, in a new tweet yesterday, said: “This 
is to clarify the earlier position which was not up to date and does not
 represent the position of the Senate President on the issue of 
screening of the newly appointed service chiefs. The Senate will perform
 its constitutional duty when it receives communication from the 
President on the appointments.”
(C) The Guardian 
 

 
No comments:
Post a Comment